How confident are our professionals

PPS, a South African insurer focused on the graduate and post graduate market recently released their confidence survey conducted with about 3000 of their members. This survey is aimed at showing the levels of confidence that graduate professionals, ie. Doctors, Lawyers, Accountants and Engineers have in South Africa and its economy.

84% remain confident about staying/living in South Africa. According to this report the successful hosting of the world cup, the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the massive skills shortage in SA are the massive contributors.

In contrast 56% of graduate professionals are confident about SA's economic outlook over the next 12months, down from 64%. Also down from 64% to 56% is the confidence in the local equities market. With only 59% believing that the Rand will strengthen over the next 12 months against other major currencies.

There is also a clear indication that professionals do not believe the worst of South Africa's economic times are over with only 45% of respondents believing the worst has hit us and 71% believing a double dip is on the way.

Government's ability to address unemployment is also a major concern with only 29% of professionals believing that it has the capacity to bring change in this important facet of our economy.

The massive hurdles in the SA economy are Crime, Health care and Education, and here professionals are clearly not very confident.On health services sentiment under graduates was low with only 46% believing that health service provision will be better under the NHS system. Only 45% believe crime rates will drop over the next five years and 48% expected better education levels over the next 5 years. The very interesting statistic that came across as that 89% of the top earners in SA are worried about the sharp escalation in costs of education.

In conclusion. One can extract that there is optimism about South Africa, its people and the private sector's ability to grow under tough circumstances, however the ability of government to address critical issues in our economy does not bolster much confidence.

Ignorance or Ignoring

King III, the good for proper corporate governance, was published on the 1st of September 2009 and the codes apply to all entities. This is very different to the old King I and King II reports that was only applicable to public or listed entities. The question I however want to ask today is whether the property syndication industry are working along these ethical guidelines.
I firmly believe that they are probably not. This, to me, is evident from the constitution and guidelines of the Public Property Syndication Association (PPSA) that does not mention compliance to any of these codes. Two of the syndication companies I have had dealings with namely Blue Everest Investments and City Capital (Capital Investments), both of which are now defunct never conformed to King I or King II and it did directly apply to them as public companies. Further the Financial Services Board (FSB) also does not mention it at all as one of the 1.8 licence requirements.

Now the next question we have to ask is why? Is it ignorance or just ignoring it. Is it because the cost of compliance is excessive? Well before you answer that question for yourself, let’s look at why compliance to these codes are, at least in my opinion, important.
The King reports are all about conducting an ethical and transparent business. It is about disclosing all the facts to all stakeholders, giving access to required information, it is about accountability of company directors, it is about thinking of others. The codes also places strong emphasis on independent directorship and active shareholder participation. In conclusion it is about playing open transparent cards and honest commentary to everyone involved and respected writers like Bruce Cameron and Deon Basson has been claiming that is the last thing that they are doing.

Now that you have some information to make up your own mind on why the property syndication industry may not be applying these codes let’s focus on being active in demanding the application of the codes. Financial Advisors, Regulators and the public in general should demand the application of King III in all syndicated companies and fractional ownership schemes so that we insure that it is not avoided by ignorance. This will then make it extremely clear which promoters is ignoring ethical, transparent and honest business practices.

If you want to find out more about King III, the New Companies Act or the Consumer Protection Act visit http://www.sinkorswim.co.za/ or contact john@sinkorswim.co.za