The new King III report puts a much larger emphasis on so called Triple Bottom Line reporting for businesses. Business is not just about making money anymore as it is about how you make the money and whether you take from the people and planet or give to the people and planet.
Obviously as King III applies to all entities it is placing a bigger burden on smaller business to also comply to these codes and therefore we are seeing a bit of resistance to King III. That said King III has an apply or explain approach and therefore I am off the opinion that this approach makes it accessible to most businesses. But what does apply or explain mean? This basically means that you need to apply your mind on how you can comply, do the best you can do to comply and explain why you can’t do more. So basically it is a soft and positive approach rather than the traditional comply or else like in the US system. With the recent global meltdown I am sure we can debate for hours on the success of the more aggressive approach taken by the US government in governance.
I do however believe we need to ask ourselves a more prudent question. Is it good business to comply to King III? Well let’s not debate the legal issues around it but the pure advantage that it will offer you, if any. I think the answer is a resounding YES. Most of us as directors spend 110% of our time working IN our businesses focussing on our functional role within the company and we don’t spent any time working ON our businesses focussing on strategic and long term visions. When complying and applying King III into your business you will force yourself to spent at least some time ON your business and just in that the advantage of compliance is massive.
In conclusion, every change brings opportunity and risk and compliance to King and THINKING about Poeple, Planet and Profit will give more opportunity to you to manage your business effectively. Non compliance only brings risk. So my opinion is: Lets apply King III.
To find out more about King III, the New Companies Act or the Consumer Protection Act please visit http://www.sinkorswim.co.za/
Showing posts with label King II. Show all posts
Showing posts with label King II. Show all posts
Monday, October 5, 2009
Monday, September 28, 2009
Property Syndication and King III
Although King III was only “launched” on the 1st of September this year we have to already start asking whether the Property Syndication is gearing towards the compliance of King III. That said it may even be extremely prudent to ask if they have ever been King I or II compliant. As the aim of the King reports was directly related to Public and Listed companies.
A lot has been said about the Property Syndication industry with a wave of allegations made against the operators. Some warranted and some maybe not. I believe that most of the attacks have been along the wrong avenue. We have seen some esteemed writers hammering the syndication industry about shareholder communication, so called inflated returns and poor and expensive management principles. Although these items are obviously extremely relevant and more than just idle points of discussion I believe that more emphasis should be placed on whether property syndication promoters subscribe to the King II and now King III rules of governance.
The basic reality is that most may not even know of the King reports. For example the directors of the now defunct Blue Everest Investments never even attempted to subscribe to King I and II and I believe that this was due to ignorance to its existence. Is that an excuse? I don’t think so, Asset Manager City Capital also never attempted compliance to King. Why not? Is it pure ignorance from the public, the promoters and from brokers alike? Is it that the so called governing body ,the Public Property Syndication Association better known as the PPSA, does not even mention compliance of King in their constitution? Or is it because we never demanded it?
In an industry that is bombarded by negative press brokers still keep selling their products and we are led to believe that it is merely the high commission being paid that motivates selling the products. I am however of the opinion that the concept behind the industry is solid and could be a fantastic investment for investors, but only if the syndication industry is more aggressively regulated by us, the public. Having an FSB number is no longer enough to protect the public, as clearly evident in the Capital Investments debacle. Capital Investments was/is a fully licensed Asset Manager and millions of rands are alleged to have been lost in this investment platform.
The focus for the immediate future should be to look at items like proper governance, ie. King III and the broker industry should demand compliance to these codes.
To find out more about the New Companies Act, King III and the Consumer Protection Act please visit www.sinkorswim.co.za
A lot has been said about the Property Syndication industry with a wave of allegations made against the operators. Some warranted and some maybe not. I believe that most of the attacks have been along the wrong avenue. We have seen some esteemed writers hammering the syndication industry about shareholder communication, so called inflated returns and poor and expensive management principles. Although these items are obviously extremely relevant and more than just idle points of discussion I believe that more emphasis should be placed on whether property syndication promoters subscribe to the King II and now King III rules of governance.
The basic reality is that most may not even know of the King reports. For example the directors of the now defunct Blue Everest Investments never even attempted to subscribe to King I and II and I believe that this was due to ignorance to its existence. Is that an excuse? I don’t think so, Asset Manager City Capital also never attempted compliance to King. Why not? Is it pure ignorance from the public, the promoters and from brokers alike? Is it that the so called governing body ,the Public Property Syndication Association better known as the PPSA, does not even mention compliance of King in their constitution? Or is it because we never demanded it?
In an industry that is bombarded by negative press brokers still keep selling their products and we are led to believe that it is merely the high commission being paid that motivates selling the products. I am however of the opinion that the concept behind the industry is solid and could be a fantastic investment for investors, but only if the syndication industry is more aggressively regulated by us, the public. Having an FSB number is no longer enough to protect the public, as clearly evident in the Capital Investments debacle. Capital Investments was/is a fully licensed Asset Manager and millions of rands are alleged to have been lost in this investment platform.
The focus for the immediate future should be to look at items like proper governance, ie. King III and the broker industry should demand compliance to these codes.
To find out more about the New Companies Act, King III and the Consumer Protection Act please visit www.sinkorswim.co.za
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
King III Anounced
“Governance in the past was about board effectiveness, currently it is risk management whilst the future of governance is King III” Lindie Engelbrecht of IODSA (Institute of Directors South Africa).
On the 8th of September Webber Wentzel in association with IODSA gave us a brief overview on the newly launched King III and the methodology and mindset behind creating it. The two most powerful messages, in my humble mind, was the fact that King III has taken an “apply or explain” approach and the fact that we in South Africa will now enter into an “All inclusive stakeholder environment”. The key question is was does this mean.
Apply or explain effectively destroys the “tick the box” concept as was the norm in compliance and governance. This change in mindset from “do or else” is definitely an aim at giving governance a more positive approach. The part that I personally enjoyed the most was the fact that it now forces company officers and directors to actually think about every aspect of King III in their compliance. Thus not comply or explain, but the apply your mind and explain what and how you did it.
It is international standards that all stakeholders in companies are regarded as important in the business. However the shareholders rights come first !!! The New Companies Act changes that all together. All stakeholders are now equal and their rights are protected in line with Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Overall King III is not only a new international benchmark in corporate governance but also a progressive look at responsible directorship and elevating the position of directors into a more and more professional world.
Fore more information about King III and The New Companies Act please visit www.sinkorswim.co.za
On the 8th of September Webber Wentzel in association with IODSA gave us a brief overview on the newly launched King III and the methodology and mindset behind creating it. The two most powerful messages, in my humble mind, was the fact that King III has taken an “apply or explain” approach and the fact that we in South Africa will now enter into an “All inclusive stakeholder environment”. The key question is was does this mean.
Apply or explain effectively destroys the “tick the box” concept as was the norm in compliance and governance. This change in mindset from “do or else” is definitely an aim at giving governance a more positive approach. The part that I personally enjoyed the most was the fact that it now forces company officers and directors to actually think about every aspect of King III in their compliance. Thus not comply or explain, but the apply your mind and explain what and how you did it.
It is international standards that all stakeholders in companies are regarded as important in the business. However the shareholders rights come first !!! The New Companies Act changes that all together. All stakeholders are now equal and their rights are protected in line with Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Overall King III is not only a new international benchmark in corporate governance but also a progressive look at responsible directorship and elevating the position of directors into a more and more professional world.
Fore more information about King III and The New Companies Act please visit www.sinkorswim.co.za
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)